Re: [PATCH] mm/swapfile: mm/swapfile: fix swapoff vs. software dirty bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:08:46 +0300
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
> <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Fixes a regression introduced with commit 179ef71cbc085252
> > "mm: save soft-dirty bits on swapped pages"
> >
> > The maybe_same_pte() function is used to match a swap pte independent
> > of the swap software dirty bit set with pte_swp_mksoft_dirty().
> >
> > For CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY=y but CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY=n the
> > software dirty bit may be set but maybe_same_pte() will not recognize
> > a software dirty swap pte. Due to this a 'swapoff -a' will hang.
> >
> > The straightforward solution is to replace CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
> > with HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY in maybe_same_pte().
> >
> > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> We've been discussing this already
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/138664
 
Yes indeed. I'm still trying to find out how this mail has been
sent a second time. That was not intentional, sorry for the noise.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]