On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:36:48PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:50:15 +0900 > Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Output of cpu 3, 7 are mixed and it's not easy to analyze it. > > > > I think that it'd be better not to sort stack trace. How do > > you think about it? Could you fix it, please? > > It may not be that easy to fix because of the sorting algorithm. That > would require looking going ahead one more event each time and then > checking if its a stacktrace. I may look at it and see if I can come up > with something that's not too invasive in the algorithms. Okay. > That said, for now you can use the --cpu option. I'm not sure I ever > documented it as it was originally added for debugging, but I use it > enough that it may be worth while to officially support it. > > trace-cmd report --cpu 3 > > Will show you just cpu 3 and nothing else. Which is what I use a lot. Thanks for the input. It works but it's not sufficient to me. Page reference is manipulated by multiple cpus so it's better to analyze unified output. > > But doing the stack trace thing may be something to fix as well. I'll > see what I can do, but no guarantees. Okay. Don't be hurry. :) trace-cmd is excellent and works well for me as it is. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>