On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:11:40 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <js1304@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Until now, COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX is defined as SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX.
> Commit ("mm: increase SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX to batch TLB flushes")
> changes SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX from 32 to 256 to improve tlb flush performance
> so COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX is also changed to 256.
"mm: increase SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX to batch TLB flushes" has been in limbo
for quite a while. Because it has been unclear whether the patch's
benefits exceed its costs+risks.
We should make a decision here - either do the appropriate testing or
drop the patch.
> But, it has
> no justification on compaction-side and I think that loss is more than
> benefit.
>
> One example is that migration scanner would isolates and migrates
> too many pages unnecessarily with 256 COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX. It may be
> enough to migrate 4 pages in order to make order-2 page, but, now,
> compaction will migrate 256 pages.
>
> To reduce this unneeded overhead, this patch restores
> COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX to 32.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ enum {
> };
>
> #define SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX 256UL
> -#define COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
> +#define COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX 32UL
>
> /*
> * Ratio between zone->managed_pages and the "gap" that above the per-zone
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>