On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > A question: SLAB takes the "boot_cache" into account before calling > should_failslab(), but SLUB does not. Should we also do so for SLUB? Not necessary in SLUB. > Besides, maybe we can consolidate first loop and replace it with > slab_post_alloc_hook()? Ok. > Or should we create trace calls that are specific to bulk'ing? > (which would allow us to study/record bulk sizes) I would prefer that. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>