Hi Ard, On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 01:28:14PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > This series adds support for booting the 32-bit ARM kernel directly from > UEFI firmware using a builtin UEFI stub. It mostly reuses refactored arm64 > code, and the differences (primarily the PE/COFF header and entry point and > the efi_create_mapping() implementation) are split out into arm64 and ARM > versions. > > Since I did not receive any further comments in reply to v3 from the people who > commented on v2, I think this series in now in sufficient shape to be pulled. > Note that patch #1 touches mm/memblock.c and include/linux/memblock.h, for which > get_maintainer.pl does not provide a maintainer, so it has been cc'ed to various > past editors of those files, and to the linux-mm mailing list. > > Since the series affects both arm64 and ARM, it is up to the maintainers to let > me know how and when they wish to proceed with this. My suggestion would be to > send out pull request for patches #1 - #5 to the arm64 maintainer, and for the > whole series to the ARM maintainer. This should keep any conflicts on either > side confined to the respective maintainer tree, rather then propagating all the > way to -next. For the arm64 bits (patches 2-5): Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> I'd really like an ack from the mm crowd on patch 1 before I queue it. Will -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>