On Wed 2015-12-02 22:43:31, Chris Snook wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:35 PM David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:21:29 +0100 > > > > > On Sat 28-11-15 15:51:13, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >> > > >> atl1c driver is doing order-4 allocation with GFP_ATOMIC > > >> priority. That often breaks networking after resume. Switch to > > >> GFP_KERNEL. Still not ideal, but should be significantly better. > > > > > > It is not clear why GFP_KERNEL can replace GFP_ATOMIC safely neither > > > from the changelog nor from the patch context. > > > > Earlier in the function we do a GFP_KERNEL kmalloc so: > > > > ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > > > > It should be fine. > > > > AFAICT, the people who benefit from GFP_ATOMIC are the people running all > their storage over NFS/iSCSI who are suspending their machines while > they're so busy they don't have any clean order 4 pagecache to drop, and > want the machine to panic rather than hang. The people who benefit >from iSCSI on machine that suspends... is that a joke or complicated way of saying that noone benefits? And code uses... both GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_KERNEL so that both sides are equally unhappy? :-). Do you want to test the patch, update the subject line and send it to Davem, or should I do it? Do you see a way to split the allocation? Not even order 4 GFP_KERNEL allocation is a nice thing to do... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>