On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2015-11-25 18:02 GMT+03:00 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:43:54PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 04:01:41PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> > So, the only way the patch could have caused the above is if someone
>>> > who isn't the task itself is writing to the bitfields while the task
>>> > is running. Looking through the fields, ->sched_reset_on_fork seems a
>>> > bit suspicious. __sched_setscheduler() looks like it can modify the
>>> > bit while the target task is running. Peter, am I misreading the
>>> > code?
>>>
>>> Nope, that's quite possible. Looks like we need to break up those
>>> bitfields a bit. All the scheduler ones should be serialized by
>>> scheduler locks, but the others are fair game.
>>
>> Maybe something like so; but my brain is a complete mess today.
>>
>> ---
>> include/linux/sched.h | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
>> index f425aac63317..b474e0f05327 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>> @@ -1455,14 +1455,15 @@ struct task_struct {
>> /* Used for emulating ABI behavior of previous Linux versions */
>> unsigned int personality;
>>
>> - unsigned in_execve:1; /* Tell the LSMs that the process is doing an
>> - * execve */
>> - unsigned in_iowait:1;
>> -
>> - /* Revert to default priority/policy when forking */
>> + /* scheduler bits, serialized by scheduler locks */
>> unsigned sched_reset_on_fork:1;
>> unsigned sched_contributes_to_load:1;
>> unsigned sched_migrated:1;
>> + unsigned __padding_sched:29;
>
> AFAIK the order of bit fields is implementation defined, so GCC could
> sort all these bits as it wants.
> You could use unnamed zero-widht bit-field to force padding:
>
> unsigned :0; //force aligment to the next boundary.
>
>> +
>> + /* unserialized, strictly 'current' */
>> + unsigned in_execve:1; /* bit to tell LSMs we're in execve */
>> + unsigned in_iowait:1;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
>> unsigned memcg_may_oom:1;
>> #endif
>>
I've gathered some evidence that in my case the guilty bit is
sched_reset_on_fork:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller/o8VqvYNEu_I/I0pXGx79DQAJ
This patch should help.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>