Re: [PATCH] mm/vmstat: retrieve more accurate vmstat value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 25-11-15 14:43:38, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/25/2015 01:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 24-11-15 15:22:03, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >> When I tested compaction in low memory condition, I found that
> >> my benchmark is stuck in congestion_wait() at shrink_inactive_list().
> >> This stuck last for 1 sec and after then it can escape. More investigation
> >> shows that it is due to stale vmstat value. vmstat is updated every 1 sec
> >> so it is stuck for 1 sec.
> > 
> > Wouldn't it be sufficient to use zone_page_state_snapshot in
> > too_many_isolated?
> 
> That sounds better than the ad-hoc half-solution, yeah.
> I don't know how performance sensitive the callers are, but maybe it could do a
> non-snapshot check first, and only repeat with _snapshot when it's about to wait
> (the result is true), just to make sure?

I am not sure this is worth bothering. We are in the reclaim which is
not a hot path.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]