Hello,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:25:12PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> @@ -610,6 +625,12 @@ repeat:
> if (work) {
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> work->func(work);
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&worker->lock);
> + /* Allow to queue the work into another worker */
> + if (!kthread_work_pending(work))
> + work->worker = NULL;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&worker->lock);
Doesn't this mean that the work item can't be freed from its callback?
That pattern tends to happen regularly.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>