On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > + unsigned long reclaimable; > > > + unsigned long target; > > > + > > > + reclaimable = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) + > > > + zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE) + > > > + zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON); > > > > Does NR_ISOLATED_ANON mean anything relevant here in swapless > > environments? > > It should be 0 so I didn't bother to check for swapless configuration. > I'm not sure I understand your point, memory compaction certainly increments NR_ISOLATED_ANON and that would be considered unreclaimable in a swapless environment, correct? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>