On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:49:57AM +0100, Dominik Dingel wrote: > When calling fixup_userfault with FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY, fixup_userfault > didn't care about VM_FAULT_RETRY and returned 0. If the VM_FAULT_RETRY flag is > set we will return the complete result of handle_mm_fault. > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Dingel <dingel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/gup.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c > index deafa2c..2af3b31 100644 > --- a/mm/gup.c > +++ b/mm/gup.c > @@ -609,6 +609,8 @@ int fixup_user_fault(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm, > return -EFAULT; > BUG(); > } > + if (ret & VM_FAULT_RETRY) > + return ret; Nope. fixup_user_fault() return errno, not VM_FAULT_* mask. I guess it should be return -EBUSY; > if (tsk) { > if (ret & VM_FAULT_MAJOR) > tsk->maj_flt++; > -- > 2.3.9 > -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>