On 17.11.2015 4:58, yalin wang wrote:
>
>> On Nov 17, 2015, at 10:43, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:21:47 +0800
>> yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Because the print_fmt has nothing to do with the fields. You can have
>> as your print_fmt as:
>>
>> TP_printk("Message = %s", "hello dolly!")
>>
>> And both userspace and the kernel with process that correctly (if I got
>> string processing working in userspace, which I believe I do). The
>> string is processed, it's not dependent on TP_STRUCT__entry() unless it
>> references a field there. Which can also be used too:
>>
>> TP_printk("Message = %s", __entry->musical ? "Hello dolly!" :
>> "Death Trap!")
>>
>> userspace will see in the entry:
>>
>> print_fmt: "Message = %s", REC->musical ? "Hello dolly!" : "Death Trap!"
>>
>> as long as the field "musical" exists, all is well.
>>
>> -- Steve
> Aha, i see.
> Thanks very much for your explanation.
> Better print fat is :
> TP_printk("mm=%p, scan_pfn=%s, writable=%d, referenced=%d, none_or_zero=%d, status=%s, unmapped=%d",
> __entry->mm,
> __entry->pfn == (-1UL) ? "(null)" : itoa(buff, __entry->pin, 10), …..)
>
> is this possible ?
I doubt so.
Why don't we just do (with %lx):
__entry->pfn != -1UL ? __entry->pfn : 0,
Status already tells us that it's not a real pfn 0 (which I doubt would be
userspace-mapped and thus reachable by khugepaged anyway?).
Also it's what some other tracepoints do, see e.g. mm_page class in
include/trace/events/kmem.h.
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>