On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 08:47:34PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> > Who is going to take this patch? If I should take the patch, I need an > ACK from the memory mgmt folks. I would suggest to resend in CC to Andrew to merge in -mm after taking care of the below, as it's a mm common code part. > > Christian > > > >> --- > >> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c > >> index c29ddeb..a8b5347 100644 > >> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c > >> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c > >> @@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > >> /* > >> * Be somewhat over-protective like KSM for now! > >> */ > >> - if (*vm_flags & (VM_NOHUGEPAGE | VM_NO_THP)) > >> + if (*vm_flags & VM_NO_THP) > >> return -EINVAL; > >> *vm_flags &= ~VM_HUGEPAGE; > >> *vm_flags |= VM_NOHUGEPAGE; If we make this change the MADV_HUGEPAGE must be taken care of too or it doesn't make sense to threat them differently. After taking care of the MADV_HUGEPAGE you can add my reviewed-by when you resubmit to Andrew. Thanks, Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>