On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:57 +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:43:11PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:18 +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > Recent PAT patchset has caused issue on 32-bit PAE machines:
> > :
> > > The problem is in pmd_pfn_mask() and pmd_flags_mask(). These helpers use
> > > PMD_PAGE_MASK to calculate resulting mask. PMD_PAGE_MASK is 'unsigned
> > > long', not 'unsigned long long' as physaddr_t. As result upper bits of
> > > resulting mask is truncated.
> > >
> > > The patch reworks code to use PMD_SHIFT as base of mask calculation
> > > instead of PMD_PAGE_MASK.
> > >
> > > pud_pfn_mask() and pud_flags_mask() aren't problematic since we don't
> > > have PUD page table level on 32-bit systems, but they reworked too to be
> > > consistent with PMD counterpart.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reported-and-Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Fixes: f70abb0fc3da ("x86/asm: Fix pud/pmd interfaces to handle large PAT
> > > bit")
> > > Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h | 14 ++++----------
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> > > b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> > > index dd5b0aa9dd2f..c1e797266ce9 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> > > @@ -279,17 +279,14 @@ static inline pmdval_t native_pmd_val(pmd_t pmd)
> > > static inline pudval_t pud_pfn_mask(pud_t pud)
> > > {
> > > if (native_pud_val(pud) & _PAGE_PSE)
> > > - return PUD_PAGE_MASK & PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK;
> > > + return ~((1ULL << PUD_SHIFT) - 1) & PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK;
> >
> > Thanks for the fix! Should we fix the PMD/PUD MASK/SIZE macros, so that we
> > do not hit the same issue again when they are used?
>
> I don't this so. PAGE_SIZE is not 'unsigned long long'. And all *PAGE_MASK
> are usually applied to virtual addresses which are 'unsigned long'.
> I think it's safer to leave them as they are.
Thanks for the explanation! That makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxxx>
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>