On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > Hi Kevin and Kernel CI folks, > > Could lkdtm get added to the kernel-CI workflows? Extracting and > validating Oops details when poking lkdtm would be extremely valuable > for these cases. :) Yeah, we can add that. What arches should we expect this to be working on? For starters we'll get builds going with CONFIG_LKDTM=y, and then start looking at adding the tests on arches that should work. Thes will be an interesting failure modes to catch because a kernel panic is actually a PASS, and a failure to panic is a FAIL. :) Kevin -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>