On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, Catalin Marinas wrote: > BTW, assuming L1_CACHE_BYTES is 512 (I don't ever see this happening but > just in theory), we potentially have the same issue. What would save us > is that INDEX_NODE would match the first "kmalloc-512" cache, so we have > it pre-populated. Ok maybe add some BUILD_BUG_ONs to ensure that builds fail until we have addressed that. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>