Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Wait, this series doesn't include Tetsuo's change. Of course it won't > > fix the deadlock problem. What's necessary is Tetsuo's patch + > > WQ_MEM_RECLAIM. > > This series is only dealing with vmstat changes. Do I get an ack here? > Then, you need to update below description (or drop it) because patch 3/3 alone will not guarantee that the counters are up to date. Christoph Lameter wrote: > Seems that vmstat needs its own workqueue now since the general > workqueue mechanism has been *enhanced* which means that the > vmstat_updates cannot run reliably but are being blocked by > work requests doing memory allocation. Which causes vmstat > to be unable to keep the counters up to date. I am waiting for decision from candidates listed at http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201510251952.CEF04109.OSOtLFHFVFJMQO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx . If your series is not for backporting, please choose one from the candidates. Can you accept the original patch at http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201510212126.JIF90648.HOOFJVFQLMStOF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx which implements (1) from the candidates? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>