Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:39:11AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> 
> > The problem would be that the "struct task_struct" to execute vmstat_update
> > job does not exist, and will not be able to create one on demand because we
> > are stuck at __GFP_WAIT allocation. Therefore adding a dedicated kernel
> > thread for vmstat_update job would work. But ...
> 
> Yuck. Can someone please get this major screwup out of the work queue
> subsystem? Tejun?

Hmmm?  Just use a dedicated workqueue with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM.  If
concurrency management is a problem and there's something live-locking
for that work item (really?), WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE escapes it.  If this is
a common occurrence that it makes sense to give vmstat higher
priority, set WQ_HIGHPRI.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]