Re: [PATCH 2/12] mm: rmap use pte lock not mmap_sem to set PageMlocked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:25:56PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>>I think we need to have at lease WRITE_ONCE() everywhere we update
> >>>vm_flags and READ_ONCE() where we read it without mmap_sem taken.
> 
> It wouldn't hurt to check if seeing a stale value or using non-atomic RMW
> can be a problem somewhere. In this case it's testing, not changing, so RMW
> is not an issue. But the check shouldn't consider arbitrary changes made by
> a potentially crazy compiler.
> 
> >>Not a series I'll embark upon myself,
> >>and the patch at hand doesn't make things worse.
> >
> >I think it does.
> 
> So what's the alternative? Hm could we keep the trylock on mmap_sem under
> pte lock? The ordering is wrong, but it's a trylock, so no danger of
> deadlock?

This patch is okay for now as it fixes bug. I mean more real bug than it
introduces ;)

But situation with locking around ->vm_flags is getting worse. ->mmap_sem
doesn't serve it well.  We need to come up with something better.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]