Re: [GIT PULL] workqueue fixes for v4.3-rc5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> So why is this a bugfix? If cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, then things
>> _shouldn't_ care which cpu it gets run on.
>
> UNBOUND means not fixed to a processor.

That's exactly what I'm saying.

And "schedule_delayed_work()" uses WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.

YOUR code assumes that means "local CPU".

And I say that's bogus.

In this email you seem to even agree that its' bogus, but then you
wrote another email saying that the code isn't confused, because it
uses "schedule_delayed_work()" on the CPU that it wants to run the
code on.

I'm saying that mm/vmstat.c should use "schedule_delayed_work_on()".

               Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]