On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > Thus, I need introducing new code like this patch and at the same time > have to reduce the number of instruction-cache misses/usage. In this > case we solve the problem by kmem_cache_free_bulk() not getting called > too often. Thus, +17 bytes will hopefully not matter too much... but on > the other hand we sort-of know that calling kmem_cache_free_bulk() will > cause icache misses. Can we just drop the WARN/BUG here? Nothing untoward happens if size == 0 right? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>