Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On (09/25/15 10:27), Vitaly Wool wrote:
> > Have you seen those symptoms before? How did you come up to a conclusion
> > that zram->zbud will do the trick?
> 
> I have data from various tests (partially described here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/17/244) and once again, I'll post a reply

yeah, I guess I'm just not so bright to quickly understand what is wrong
with zsmalloc from those numbers.

> to https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/15/33 with more detailed test
> description and explanation why zsmalloc is not the right choice for
> me.

great, thanks.

> > If those symptoms are some sort of a recent addition, then does it help
> > when you disable zsmalloc compaction?
> 
> No it doesn't. OTOH enabled zsmalloc compaction doesn't seem to have a
> substantial effect either.

hm. ok, that was my quick guess.

	-ss

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]