Hi,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:30:13PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> The oom killer takes task_lock() in a couple of places solely to protect
> printing the task's comm.
>
> A process's comm, including current's comm, may change due to
> /proc/pid/comm or PR_SET_NAME.
>
> The comm will always be NULL-terminated, so the worst race scenario would
> only be during update. We can tolerate a comm being printed that is in
> the middle of an update to avoid taking the lock.
>
> Other locations in the kernel have already dropped task_lock() when
> printing comm, so this is consistent.
Without the protection, can't reading task->comm race with PR_SET_NAME
as described below?
Let T->comm[16] = "name\0rubbish1234"
CPU1 CPU2
---- ----
set_task_comm(T, "longname\0")
T->comm[0] = 'l'
T->comm[1] = 'o'
T->comm[2] = 'n'
T->comm[3] = 'g'
T->comm[4] = 'n'
printk("%s\n", T->comm)
T->comm = "longnrubbish1234"
OOPS: the string is not
nil-terminated!
T->comm[5] = 'a'
T->comm[6] = 'm'
T->comm[7] = 'e'
T->comm[8] = '\0'
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>