Hello, Petr. On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 03:03:43PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > It enforces using kthread_worker_fn() for the main thread. But I doubt > that there are any plans to create any alternative. In fact, I think > that we do not want any alternative main thread because it would be > hard to support consistency with the rest of the kthread worker API. The original intention was allowing users to use a wrapper function which sets up kthread attributes and then calls kthread_worker_fn(). That can be done by a work item too but is more cumbersome. Just wanted to note that. Will keep reading on. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>