On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:20:01AM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index e2d46ad..b029d42 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ static inline void clear_soft_dirty(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
> if (pte_present(ptent)) {
> ptent = pte_wrprotect(ptent);
> - ptent = pte_clear_flags(ptent, _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY);
> + ptent = pte_clear_soft_dirty(ptent);
> } else if (is_swap_pte(ptent)) {
> ptent = pte_swp_clear_soft_dirty(ptent);
> }
> @@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ static inline void clear_soft_dirty_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pmd_t pmd = *pmdp;
>
> pmd = pmd_wrprotect(pmd);
> - pmd = pmd_clear_flags(pmd, _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY);
> + pmd = pmd_clear_soft_dirty(pmd);
>
You know, these are only two lines where we use _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY
directly, so I don't see much point in adding 22 lines of code
for that. Maybe we can leave it as is?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>