Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] debugfs: don't assume sizeof(bool) to be 4 bytes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:38:32 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> But that user interface issue doesn't seem to be the case here, an I
> can't say that I mind the patch. It looks fairly sane.

If Linus is fine with it, I'm fine with it too.

But please, next time, go easy on the Cc list. Maybe just use bcc for
those not on the list, stating that you BCC'd a lot of people to make
sure this is sane, but didn't want to spam everyone with every reply.

What do others think when there's a change that goes across the board
this much? BCC OK with you, as just an FYI, I'm doing this? Or should
just the lists be enough and if you don't see it, too bad?

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]