Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] debugfs: don't assume sizeof(bool) to be 4 bytes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15-09-15, 09:45, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Then break up the patch.

That will cause build warnings between the patches due to prototype
mismatch. Maybe I should ignore get_maintainers for this patch and
just cc the lists :)

> Your Cc list is far too large, I would nack
> this patch just for that alone.

:(

> Sad part is, you didn't even Cc Linus (which I added). I believe he was
> against having bool's in structures before.

Sorry about that, I had no clue that I should explicitly include Linus
to this thread.

> Linus, This patch changes a lot of u32s into bools in structures.
> What's your take on that?
> 
> I added the patch again to the bottom of this email so that Linus may
> see it (it was cut from the email I'm replying to).

Thanks Steven.

-- 
viresh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]