On Sat 12-09-15 20:22:58, Wu Fengguang wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git since-4.2 > head: 62799b075621cec2d2a777837187a2885ccd977e > commit: ad2ff3822c558e410ca3f4bd6ed9f0ea18c59e58 [242/301] mm: mlock: add new mlock system call > config: openrisc-or1ksim_defconfig (attached as .config) > reproduce: > wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > git checkout ad2ff3822c558e410ca3f4bd6ed9f0ea18c59e58 > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make.cross ARCH=openrisc > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from include/asm-generic/unistd.h:1:0, > from arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h:26, > from arch/openrisc/kernel/sys_call_table.c:27: > >> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:713:1: error: array index in initializer exceeds array bounds > include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:713:1: error: (near initialization for 'sys_call_table') > > vim +713 include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h > > 707 __SYSCALL(__NR_memfd_create, sys_memfd_create) > 708 #define __NR_bpf 280 > 709 __SYSCALL(__NR_bpf, sys_bpf) > 710 #define __NR_execveat 281 > 711 __SC_COMP(__NR_execveat, sys_execveat, compat_sys_execveat) > 712 #define __NR_mlock2 283 > > 713 __SYSCALL(__NR_mlock2, sys_mlock2) > 714 > 715 #undef __NR_syscalls > 716 #define __NR_syscalls 283 My fault! I have misapplied the patch. Thanks for catching this up. Pushed to my tree. --- >From 177442272f98b7d8b89b1b1adec003c93717dd0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:37:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix misapplied "mm: mlock: add new mlock system call" __NR_syscalls wasn't updated properly which has been caught by 0-day compile test: >> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:713:1: error: array index in initializer exceeds array bounds include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:713:1: error: (near initialization for 'sys_call_table') vim +713 include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h 707 __SYSCALL(__NR_memfd_create, sys_memfd_create) 708 #define __NR_bpf 280 709 __SYSCALL(__NR_bpf, sys_bpf) 710 #define __NR_execveat 281 711 __SC_COMP(__NR_execveat, sys_execveat, compat_sys_execveat) 712 #define __NR_mlock2 283 > 713 __SYSCALL(__NR_mlock2, sys_mlock2) 714 715 #undef __NR_syscalls 716 #define __NR_syscalls 283 The original patch was correct. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> --- include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h index a2fe1b92527d..f270a6654f2f 100644 --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ __SC_COMP(__NR_execveat, sys_execveat, compat_sys_execveat) __SYSCALL(__NR_mlock2, sys_mlock2) #undef __NR_syscalls -#define __NR_syscalls 283 +#define __NR_syscalls 284 /* * All syscalls below here should go away really, -- 2.5.0 -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>