Re: slab:Fix the unexpected index mapping result of kmalloc_size(INDEX_NODE + 1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> So, when we initialize 96, 192 or 8, proper slab isn't initialized.
> If we allow debug_pagealloc larger than 256 sized slab,
> small sized slab would be already initialized so no error
> happens. I think it is better than
> kmalloc_size(INDEX_NODE) * 2, because that doesn't
> guarantee size is larger than 192.

Sounds good. Please send a patch.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]