Re: Is it OK to pass non-acquired objects to kfree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:

> > It changes the first word of the object after the barrier. The first word
> > is used in SLUB as the pointer to the next free object.
>
> User can also write to this object after it is reallocated. It is
> equivalent to kmalloc writing to the object.
> And barrier is not the kind of barrier that would make it correct.
> So I do not see how it is relevant.

This is a compiler barrier so nothing can be moved below that into the
code where the freelist pointer is handled. That was the issue from what
I heard?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]