Re: [PATCH 10/12] userfaultfd: powerpc: Bump up __NR_syscalls to account for __NR_userfaultfd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 22:43 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> With userfaultfd syscall, the number of syscalls will be 365 on PowerPC.
> Reflect the same in __NR_syscalls.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
> index f4f8b66..4a055b6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
>  #include <uapi/asm/unistd.h>
>  
> 
> -#define __NR_syscalls		364
> +#define __NR_syscalls		365

I guess technically it's OK for this to get bumped first, but we typically do
it in a single patch with the addition of the syscall number.

I'd rather do the syscall addition via my tree.

cheers



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]