Re: slab-nomerge (was Re: [git pull] device mapper changes for 4.3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:10:12 -0500 (CDT) Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > But I'd still like some pointers/help on what makes slab merging so
> > beneficial.  I'm sure Christoph and others have justification.  But if
> > not then yes the default to slab merging probably should be revisited.
> 
> ...
>
> Check out the linux-mm archives for these dissussions.

Somewhat OT, but...  The question Mike asks should be comprehensively
answered right there in the switch-to-merging patch's changelog.

The fact that it is not answered in the appropriate place and that
we're reduced to vaguely waving at the list archives is a fail.  And a
lesson!

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]