Hey, On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:07:04AM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > We should probably think about introducing some kind of watermarks that > would trigger memcg reclaim, asynchronous or direct, on exceeding > them. Yeah, for max + kmemcg case, we eventually should do something similar to the global case where we try to kick off async reclaim before we hit the hard wall. Ultimately, I think punting reclaims to workqueue or return-path is a good idea anyway, so maybe it can be all part of the same mechanism. Given that the high limit is the primary control mechanism on the default hierarchy, it should be fine for now. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>