On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri 21-08-15 14:31:32, Eric B Munson wrote: > [...] >> I am in the middle of implementing lock on fault this way, but I cannot >> see how we will hanlde mremap of a lock on fault region. Say we have >> the following: >> >> addr = mmap(len, MAP_ANONYMOUS, ...); >> mlock(addr, len, MLOCK_ONFAULT); >> ... >> mremap(addr, len, 2 * len, ...) >> >> There is no way for mremap to know that the area being remapped was lock >> on fault so it will be locked and prefaulted by remap. How can we avoid >> this without tracking per vma if it was locked with lock or lock on >> fault? > > Yes mremap is a problem and it is very much similar to mmap(MAP_LOCKED). > It doesn't guarantee the full mlock semantic because it leaves partially > populated ranges behind without reporting any error. > > Considering the current behavior I do not thing it would be terrible > thing to do what Konstantin was suggesting and populate only the full > ranges in a best effort mode (it is done so anyway) and document the > behavior properly. > " > If the memory segment specified by old_address and old_size is > locked (using mlock(2) or similar), then this lock is maintained > when the segment is resized and/or relocated. As a consequence, > the amount of memory locked by the process may change. > > If the range is already fully populated and the range is > enlarged the new range is attempted to be fully populated > as well to preserve the full mlock semantic but there is no > guarantee this will succeed. Partially populated (e.g. created by > mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT)) ranges do not have the full mlock semantic > so they are not populated on resize. > " > > So what we have as a result is that partially populated ranges are > preserved and fully populated ones work in the best effort mode the same > way as they are now. > > Does that sound at least remotely reasonably? The problem is that mremap have to scan ptes to detect that and old behaviour becomes very fragile: one fail and mremap will never populate that vma again. For now I think new flag "MREMAP_NOPOPULATE" is a better option. > > > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>