On (08/17/15 18:09), Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: [..] > @@ -980,7 +979,7 @@ static struct page *alloc_zspage(struct size_class *class, gfp_t flags) > if (i == 1) > set_page_private(first_page, (unsigned long)page); > if (i >= 1) > - page->first_page = first_page; > + set_page_private(first_page, (unsigned long)first_page); This patch breaks zram/zsmalloc. Shouldn't it be `page->private = first_page' instead of `first_page->private = first_page'? IOW: - set_page_private(first_page, (unsigned long)first_page); + set_page_private(page, (unsigned long)first_page); ? -ss -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>