On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 01:13:19PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > Yes, I did think the compound destructor enum stuff over-engineered, > and would have preferred just direct calls to free_compound_page() > or free_huge_page() myself. But when I tried to make a patch on > top to do that, even when I left PageHuge out-of-line (which had > certainly not been my intention), it still generated more kernel > text than Kirill's enum version (maybe his "- 1" in compound_head > works better in some places than masking out 3, I didn't study); > so let's forget about that. I had my agenda on ->compound_dtor: my refcounting patchset introduces one more compound destructor. I wanted to avoid hardcoding them here. -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>