* Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:24:28PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:02:26PM +0100, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > > > 2015-08-13 12:01 GMT+03:00 Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>: > > > > Yes please, works for me! If we're targetting 4.3, then please can you base > > > > on 4.2-rc4, as that's what our current arm64 queue is using? > > > > > > > > > > Does this mean that we are targeting arm64 part for 4.3 too? > > > > It depends on how well it merges with our current queue and whether it > > holds up to regression testing. The patches have been reviewed, so I'm > > comfortable with the content, but we're not at a stage where we can debug > > and fix any failures that might crop up from the merge. > > Scratch that :( > > I tried this out under EFI and it dies horribly in the stub code because > we're missing at least one KASAN_SANITIZE_ Makefile entry. > > So I think this needs longer to stew before hitting mainline. By all means > get the x86 dependencies in for 4.3, but the arm64 port can probably use > another cycle to iron out the bugs. Is there any known problem with the two patches in this series, or can I apply them? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>