On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:00:05PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 20-08-15 08:26:27, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > Currently there's no easy way to get per-process usage of hugetlb pages, > > Is this really the case after your previous patch? You have both > HugetlbPages and KernelPageSize which should be sufficient no? We can calcurate it from these info, so saying "no easy way" was incorrect :( > Reading a single file is, of course, easier but is it really worth the > additional code? I haven't really looked at the patch so I might be > missing something but what would be an advantage over reading > /proc/<pid>/smaps and extracting the information from there? My first idea was just "users should feel it useful", but permission as David commented sounds a good technical reason to me. Thanks, Naoya Horiguchi��.n������g��� �a��� �&ޖ)���)��h���&������梷���� �Ǟ�m������)������^�����������v���O��zf������