On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:30:27PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > I'd be interested in the comments of others, though, to see if there is > any reservation about the hstate size breakdown. It may actually find no > current customer who is interested in parsing it. (If we keep it, I would > suggest the 'x' change to '*' similar to per-order breakdowns in > show_mem()). It may also be possible to add it later if a definitive > usecase is presented. I have no interest in parsing the size breakdown today. I might change my mind tomorrow and having the extra information hurts very little, so I won't argue against it either. > But overall I'm very happy with the new addition and think it's a good > solution to the problem. Agreed. Thank you! Jörn -- One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision. -- Bertrand Russell -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>