On Wed 05-08-15 11:51:21, mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Since "mm: page_alloc: do not lock up GFP_NOFS allocations upon OOM"
> memory allocator doesn't endlessly loop to satisfy low-order allocations
> and instead fails them to allow callers to handle them gracefully.
>
> Some of the callers are not yet prepared for this behavior though. ext4
> block allocator relies solely on GFP_NOFS allocation requests and
> allocation failures lead to aborting yournal too easily:
>
> [ 345.028333] oom-trash: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x50
> [ 345.028336] CPU: 1 PID: 8334 Comm: oom-trash Tainted: G W 4.0.0-nofs3-00006-gdfe9931f5f68 #588
> [ 345.028337] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150428_134905-gandalf 04/01/2014
> [ 345.028339] 0000000000000000 ffff880005a17708 ffffffff81538a54 ffffffff8107a40f
> [ 345.028341] 0000000000000050 ffff880005a17798 ffffffff810fe854 0000000180000000
> [ 345.028342] 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 ffffffff81a52100 0000000000000246
> [ 345.028343] Call Trace:
> [ 345.028348] [<ffffffff81538a54>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
> [ 345.028370] [<ffffffff810fe854>] warn_alloc_failed+0x12a/0x13f
> [ 345.028373] [<ffffffff81101bd2>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x7f3/0x8aa
> [ 345.028375] [<ffffffff810f9933>] pagecache_get_page+0x12a/0x1c9
> [ 345.028390] [<ffffffffa005bc64>] ext4_mb_load_buddy+0x220/0x367 [ext4]
> [ 345.028414] [<ffffffffa006014f>] ext4_free_blocks+0x522/0xa4c [ext4]
> [ 345.028425] [<ffffffffa0054e14>] ext4_ext_remove_space+0x833/0xf22 [ext4]
> [ 345.028434] [<ffffffffa005677e>] ext4_ext_truncate+0x8c/0xb0 [ext4]
> [ 345.028441] [<ffffffffa00342bf>] ext4_truncate+0x20b/0x38d [ext4]
> [ 345.028462] [<ffffffffa003573c>] ext4_evict_inode+0x32b/0x4c1 [ext4]
> [ 345.028464] [<ffffffff8116d04f>] evict+0xa0/0x148
> [ 345.028466] [<ffffffff8116dca8>] iput+0x1a1/0x1f0
> [ 345.028468] [<ffffffff811697b4>] __dentry_kill+0x136/0x1a6
> [ 345.028470] [<ffffffff81169a3e>] dput+0x21a/0x243
> [ 345.028472] [<ffffffff81157cda>] __fput+0x184/0x19b
> [ 345.028473] [<ffffffff81157d29>] ____fput+0xe/0x10
> [ 345.028475] [<ffffffff8105a05f>] task_work_run+0x8a/0xa1
> [ 345.028477] [<ffffffff810452f0>] do_exit+0x3c6/0x8dc
> [ 345.028482] [<ffffffff8104588a>] do_group_exit+0x4d/0xb2
> [ 345.028483] [<ffffffff8104eeeb>] get_signal+0x5b1/0x5f5
> [ 345.028488] [<ffffffff81002202>] do_signal+0x28/0x5d0
> [...]
> [ 345.028624] EXT4-fs error (device hdb1) in ext4_free_blocks:4879: Out of memory
> [ 345.033097] Aborting journal on device hdb1-8.
> [ 345.036339] EXT4-fs (hdb1): Remounting filesystem read-only
> [ 345.036344] EXT4-fs error (device hdb1) in ext4_reserve_inode_write:4834: Journal has aborted
> [ 345.036766] EXT4-fs error (device hdb1) in ext4_reserve_inode_write:4834: Journal has aborted
> [ 345.038583] EXT4-fs error (device hdb1) in ext4_ext_remove_space:3048: Journal has aborted
> [ 345.049115] EXT4-fs error (device hdb1) in ext4_ext_truncate:4669: Journal has aborted
> [ 345.050434] EXT4-fs error (device hdb1) in ext4_reserve_inode_write:4834: Journal has aborted
> [ 345.053064] EXT4-fs error (device hdb1) in ext4_truncate:3668: Journal has aborted
> [ 345.053582] EXT4-fs error (device hdb1) in ext4_reserve_inode_write:4834: Journal has aborted
> [ 345.053946] EXT4-fs error (device hdb1) in ext4_orphan_del:2686: Journal has aborted
> [ 345.055367] EXT4-fs error (device hdb1) in ext4_reserve_inode_write:4834: Journal has aborted
>
> The failure is really premature because GFP_NOFS allocation context is
> very restricted - especially in the fs metadata heavy loads. Before we
> go with a more sofisticated solution, let's simply imitate the previous
> behavior of non-failing NOFS allocation and use __GFP_NOFAIL for the
> buddy block allocator. I wasn't able to trigger the issue with this
> patch anymore.
The patch looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
Honza
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 5b1613a54307..e6361622bfd5 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -992,7 +992,8 @@ static int ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock(struct super_block *sb,
> block = group * 2;
> pnum = block / blocks_per_page;
> poff = block % blocks_per_page;
> - page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, pnum, GFP_NOFS);
> + page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, pnum,
> + GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
> if (!page)
> return -ENOMEM;
> BUG_ON(page->mapping != inode->i_mapping);
> @@ -1006,7 +1007,8 @@ static int ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock(struct super_block *sb,
>
> block++;
> pnum = block / blocks_per_page;
> - page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, pnum, GFP_NOFS);
> + page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, pnum,
> + GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
> if (!page)
> return -ENOMEM;
> BUG_ON(page->mapping != inode->i_mapping);
> @@ -1158,7 +1160,8 @@ ext4_mb_load_buddy(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
> * wait for it to initialize.
> */
> page_cache_release(page);
> - page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, pnum, GFP_NOFS);
> + page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, pnum,
> + GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
> if (page) {
> BUG_ON(page->mapping != inode->i_mapping);
> if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
> @@ -1194,7 +1197,8 @@ ext4_mb_load_buddy(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
> if (page == NULL || !PageUptodate(page)) {
> if (page)
> page_cache_release(page);
> - page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, pnum, GFP_NOFS);
> + page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, pnum,
> + GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
> if (page) {
> BUG_ON(page->mapping != inode->i_mapping);
> if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>