On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 04:01:22PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:12:12PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:30:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 19:29:08 +0300 Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > /proc/kpageidle should probably live somewhere in /sys/kernel/mm, but I > > > > added it where similar files are located (kpagecount, kpageflags) to > > > > keep things consistent. > > > > > > I think these files should be moved elsewhere. Consistency is good, > > > but not when we're being consistent with a bad thing. > > > > > > So let's place these in /sys/kernel/mm and then start being consistent > > > with that? > > > > I really don't think we should separate kpagecgroup from kpagecount and > > kpageflags, because they look very similar (each of them is read-only, > > contains an array of u64 values referenced by PFN). Scattering these > > files between different filesystems would look ugly IMO. > > > > However, kpageidle is somewhat different (it's read-write, contains a > > bitmap) so I think it's worth moving it to /sys/kernel/mm. We have to > > move the code from fs/proc to mm/something then to remove dependency > > from PROC_FS, which would be unnecessary. Let me give it a try. > > Here it goes: > > From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH] Move /proc/kpageidle to /sys/kernel/mm/page_idle/bitmap Since it is rather difficult to merge it into proc-add-kpageidle, should I resend the whole series with all fixes included, provided you find this patch OK of course? Thanks, Vladimir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>