On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:34:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, > so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id(). Won't it fall through to the next closest memory node in the zonelist anyway? Is this for callers doing NUMA_NO_NODE with __GFP_THISZONE? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>