On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:59:15AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 07/20/2015 10:00 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > MIGRATE_RESERVE preserves an old property of the buddy allocator that existed
> > prior to fragmentation avoidance -- min_free_kbytes worth of pages tended to
> > remain free until the only alternative was to fail the allocation. At the
>
> ^ I think you meant contiguous instead of free?
That is exactly what I meant.
> Is it because
> splitting chooses lowest possible order, and grouping by mobility means you
> might be splitting e.g. order-5 movable page instead of using order-0 unmovable
> page? And that the fallback heuristics specifically select highest available
> order? I think it's not that obvious, so worth mentioning.
>
Yes, the commit that introduced MIGRATE_RESERVE discusses it so I didn't
repeat it as the git digging is simply
1. Find the commit that introduced MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC and see it
replaced MIGRATE_RESERVE
2. Find the commit that introduced MIGRATE_RESERVE
That locates 56fd56b868f1 ("Bias the location of pages freed for
min_free_kbytes in the same MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES blocks").
> > time it was discovered that high-order atomic allocations relied on this
> > property so MIGRATE_RESERVE was introduced. A later patch will introduce
> > an alternative MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC so this patch deletes MIGRATE_RESERVE
> > and supporting code so it'll be easier to review. Note that this patch
> > in isolation may look like a false regression if someone was bisecting
> > high-order atomic allocation failures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
>
Thanks.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>