On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > The only possible downside would be existing users of
> > alloc_pages_node() that are calling it with an offline node. Since it's a
> > VM_BUG_ON() that would catch that, I think it should be changed to a
> > VM_WARN_ON() and eventually fixed up because it's nonsensical.
> > VM_BUG_ON() here should be avoided.
>
> The offline node thing could be addresses by using numa_mem_id()?
>
I was concerned about any callers that were passing an offline node, not
NUMA_NO_NODE, today. One of the alloc-node functions has a VM_BUG_ON()
for it, the other silently calls node_zonelist() on it.
I suppose the final alloc_pages_node() implementation could be
if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || VM_WARN_ON(!node_online(nid)))
nid = numa_mem_id();
VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES);
return __alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order, node_zonelist(nid, gfp_mask));
though.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>