Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Mel Gorman wrote:

> From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> 
> There is a seqcounter that protects spurious allocation fails when a task
> is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need to check the
> seqcounter until a cpuset exists.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>

but there's a typo in your email address in the signed-off-by line.  Nice 
to know you actually type them by hand though :)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]