On 07/16/2015 07:03 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 06:30:11PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >> >> I think this may work, if pud_none(*pud) will be replaced with !pud_val(*pud). >> We can't use pud_none() because with 2-level page tables it's always false, so >> we will never go down to pmd level where swapper_pg_dir populated. > > The reason I used "do ... while" vs "while" or "for" is so that it gets > down to the pmd level. The iteration over pgd is always done in the top > loop via pgd_addr_end while the loops for missing levels (nopud, nopmd) > are always a single iteration whether we check for pud_none or not. But > when the level is present, we avoid looping when !pud_none(). > Right, dunno what I was thinking. It seems to work. Lightly tested with every possible CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>