Re: [mminit] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 08:13:38PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > @@ -1187,14 +1195,14 @@ void __init page_alloc_init_late(void)
> >  {pgdat_init_rwsempgdat_init_rwsempgdat_init_rwsem
> >         int nid;
> >
> > +       /* There will be num_node_state(N_MEMORY) threads */
> > +       atomic_set(&pgdat_init_n_undone, num_node_state(N_MEMORY));
> >         for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
> > -               down_read(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
> 
> Rw-sem have special "non-owner" mode for keeping lockdep away.
> This should be enough:
> 

I think in this case that the completions look nicer though so I think
I'll keep them.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]