Re: [PATCH 17/36] arm64, thp: remove infrastructure for handling splitting PMDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/07/15 18:41, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
With new refcounting we don't need to mark PMDs splitting. Let's drop
code to handle this.

pmdp_splitting_flush() is not needed too: on splitting PMD we will do
pmdp_clear_flush() + set_pte_at(). pmdp_clear_flush() will do IPI as
needed for fast_gup.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h |  9 ---------
  arch/arm64/mm/flush.c            | 16 ----------------
  2 files changed, 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index bd5db28324ba..37cdbf37934c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -274,20 +274,11 @@ static inline pgprot_t mk_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot)

  #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
  #define pmd_trans_huge(pmd)	(pmd_val(pmd) && !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT))
-#define pmd_trans_splitting(pmd)	pte_special(pmd_pte(pmd))
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
-#define __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_SPLITTING_FLUSH
-struct vm_area_struct;
-void pmdp_splitting_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
-			  pmd_t *pmdp);
-#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE */
-#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */

Wouldn't this cause a build failure(Untested) ? We need to retain the last line,

#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */

isn't it ?


Thanks
Suzuki

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]