Re: [PATCH 7/8] memcg: get rid of mm_struct::owner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat 11-07-15 10:09:06, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
[...]
> Why can't we make root_mem_cgroup statically allocated? AFAICS it's a
> common practice - e.g. see blkcg_root, root_task_group.

It's not that easy. mem_cgroup doesn't have a fixed size. It depends
on the number of online nodes. I haven't looked closer to this yet but
cgroup has an early init code path maybe we can hook in there.

I would like to settle with the current issues described in other email
first, though. This is just a cosmetic issue.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]