On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 09:14:25 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Overall, I would say that none of these workloads justify the patch on > its own. Reducing IPIs further is nice but we got the bulk of the > benefit from the two batching patches and after that other factors > dominate. Based on the results I have, I'd be ok with the patch being > dropped. It can be reconsidered for evaluation if someone complains > about excessive IPIs again on reclaim intensive workloads. OK, thanks. The benefit is small and there is some risk of unanticipated problems. I think I'll park the patch in -mm for now and will wait to see if something happens. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>